Leveraging advanced ai algorithms for predicting outcomes in non-acute coronary syndrome chest pain patients

INTRODUCTION: Chest pain is often encountered in emergency rooms and the detection of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major focus. However, a notable percentage of patients present with a diverse range of nonACS conditions. Accurately identifying the causes and outcomes of these cases can prevent unnecessary interventions, reduce healthcare costs, and optimize resource allocation. This study aims to explore how advanced AI algorithms can enhance risk assessment, refine classification, and predict outcomes in nonACS chest pain patients using conventional ECG analysis. METHODS: We studied 3458 nonACS patients referred to the Emergency Room at Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia with chest pain. A total of 185 features, including sex, height, ECG diagnostic statements, and measures, were used. The predicted outcome was defined as hospitalization within 14 days and/or death (1 or 0). We employed the AutoGluon framework for feature engineering and early model selection. XGBoost, a tree-based model, was chosen as the architecture. Training and k-fold stratified cross-validation were performed using an oversampled balanced dataset, and evaluation metrics such as AUROC, specificity, and sensitivity were measured using the original data. RESULTS: In this study, 18.2% (630 patients) had a positive outcome. The sex distribution was comparable between outcome groups, with men accounting for 57-58% and women for 42-43%. Significant differences (p<0.01) were observed in ECG intervals (QRS, corrected QT, RR interval, PSP) between the groups. The AI model identified important diagnostic statements, including normal ECG (19.4), atrial fibrillation (7.4), left ventricular hypertrophy (7.1), Ischemic T-wave inversion in inferior leads (6.7), T-wave changes in inferior leads (5.9), and first-degree atrioventricular block (5.8). The AI model performed exceptionally well, with a sensitivity of 97.93%, specificity of 96.08%, and an AUROC of 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: The AI model demonstrated its ability to predict outcomes in patients with acute chest pain without ACS, making it an appealing tool for effective risk stratification. The early identification provided by the AI model presents an opportunity for timely intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary stenting: rationale and design of the NEOMINDSET Trial

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is currently the standard of care after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent studies suggest that reducing DAPT to 1-3 months followed by an aspirin-free single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) strategy with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor is safe and associated with less bleeding. However, to date, no randomised trial has tested the impact of initiating SAPT immediately after PCI, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). NEOMINDSET is a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial with a blinded outcome assessment designed to compare SAPT versus DAPT in 3,400 ACS patients undergoing PCI with the latest-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). After successful PCI and up to 4 days following hospital admission, patients are randomised to receive SAPT with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) or DAPT (aspirin plus a potent P2Y12 inhibitor) for 12 months. Aspirin is discontinued immediately after randomisation in the SAPT group. The choice between ticagrelor and prasugrel is at the investigator's discretion. The primary hypothesis is that SAPT will be non-inferior to DAPT with respect to the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or urgent target vessel revascularisation, but superior to DAPT on rates of bleeding defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 criteria. NEOMINDSET is the first study that is specifically designed to test SAPT versus DAPT immediately following PCI with DES in ACS patients. This trial will provide important insights on the efficacy and safety of withdrawing aspirin in the early phase of ACS.

TAVI com próteses balão-expansíveis de nova geração versus auto-expansíveis de nova geração: análise do registro brasileiro de TAVI - RIBAC-NT / TAVI with new generation balloon-expandable prostheses versus new generation self-expandable prostheses: analysis of the Brazilian TAVI registry - RIBAC-NT

INTRODUÇÃO: Não existem estudos comparando os desfechos clínicos do implante de válvula aórtica transcateter (TAVI) com próteses balão-expansíveis (BE) versus auto-expansíveis (AE) de nova geração na realidade brasileira. OBJETIVO: Comparar os resultados clínicos intra-hospitalares de TAVI realizados com próteses BE de nova geração contra próteses AE de nova geração em centros brasileiros participantes do RIBAC-NT. MÉTODOS: Foram utilizados dados de centros ativamente participantes do registro brasileiro de TAVI. Critério de inclusão: todos os procedimentos de TAVI em válvula nativa tricúspide com utilização de próteses de nova geração. Critério de exclusão principal: procedimentos pela via transapical. Os casos foram separados conforme a prótese utilizada em grupo BE (Sapien S3, S3 Ultra e Myval) e AE (Evolut R, Evolut PRO, Acurate Neo, Acurate Neo2 e Portico). Desfecho primário analisado foi morte intra-hospitalar. Desfechos secundários: complicação vascular maior, sangramento maior, sangramento com risco de vida, qualquer acidente vascular encefálico (AVE) e novo implante de marcapasso. RESULTADOS: Ao todo 1703 pacientes de 25 centros foram incluídos na análise, sendo 887 no grupo BE e 819 no grupo AE. A idade média da população foi 80,7±7,2 anos e 48,9% eram mulheres. O grupo AE teve uma maior proporção de pacientes do sexo feminino (53,5% vs. 44,6%, P=<0,001), maior prevalência de doença arterial periférica (16,2% vs. 11%, P=0,002) e de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (16,8% vs. 11,5%, P=0,002), além de Euroscore 2 maior (6,2 vs. 5,5, P=0,03). Tabela 1 estão demonstradas a comparação das características do procedimento entre os grupos. Pacientes do grupo BE realizaram mais procedimentos com anestesia geral, mais por via transfemoral e também com maior proporção de acessos totalmente percutâneos. No grupo AE houve maior necessidade de pré e pós-dilatação e discreta maior incidência de embolização e necessidade de uma segunda prótese, assim como maior incidência de oclusão coronariana. Tabela 2 sumariza o comparativo dos desfechos clínicos. Não houve diferença significativa para a mortalidade intra-hospitalar entre os grupos. Também não se observou diferença entre complicações vasculares, sangramentos, AVE e necessidade de novo marcapasso. Regressão logístico multivariada ajustando para diferenças entre os grupos não indicou diferença de mortalidade entre utilização de prótese BE vs. AE (OR 0,95, P=0,8). Preditores independentes de mortalidade foram sexo feminino (OR 0,49, P=0,009) e Euroscore 2 (OR 1,04, P=0,006). CONCLUSÃO: Em estudo de vida real de pacientes submetidos a TAVI no Brasil, não houve diferença da mortalidade intra-hospitalar entra a utilização de próteses BE de nova geração em comparação a utilização de próteses AE de nova geração.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary stenting: rationale and design of the NEOMINDSET Trial.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is currently the standard of care after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent studies suggest that reducing DAPT to 1-3 months followed by an aspirin-free single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) strategy with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor is safe and associated with less bleeding. However, to date, no randomised trial has tested the impact of initiating SAPT immediately after PCI, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). NEOMINDSET is a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial with a blinded outcome assessment designed to compare SAPT versus DAPT in 3,400 ACS patients undergoing PCI with the latest-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). After successful PCI and up to 4 days following hospital admission, patients are randomised to receive SAPT with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) or DAPT (aspirin plus a potent P2Y12 inhibitor) for 12 months. Aspirin is discontinued immediately after randomisation in the SAPT group. The choice between ticagrelor and prasugrel is at the investigator's discretion. The primary hypothesis is that SAPT will be non-inferior to DAPT with respect to the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or urgent target vessel revascularisation, but superior to DAPT on rates of bleeding defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 criteria. NEOMINDSET is the first study that is specifically designed to test SAPT versus DAPT immediately following PCI with DES in ACS patients. This trial will provide important insights on the efficacy and safety of withdrawing aspirin in the early phase of ACS. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04360720).

Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: the Transradial and Transfemoral Approach by EXPERienced Operators in Daily rouTine (EXPERT) Trial.

BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to coronary angiography reduces vascular complications but is associated with greater radiation exposure than the transfemoral approach (TFA). It is unknown whether exposure remains higher when TRA is performed by experienced operators. METHODS: Patients were randomly, prospectively assigned to TRA or TFA. The primary end point was patient radiation dose; secondary end points were the physician radiation dose and 30-day major adverse cardiac event rate. Coronary angiography was performed by experienced operators using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: Clinical and procedural characteristics were similar between the TRA (n = 150) and TFA (n = 149) groups, and they had comparable mean (SD) radiation doses for patients (616.51 [252] vs 585.57 [225] mGy; P = .13) and physicians (0.49 [0.3] vs 0.46 [0.29] mSv; P = .32). The mean (SD) fluoroscopy time (3.52 [2.02] vs 3.13 [2.46] min; P = .14) and the mean (SD) dose area product (35,496.5 [15,670] vs 38,313.4 [17,764.9] mGy·cm2; P = .2) did not differ. None of the following factors predicted higher radiation doses: female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.38-1.3]; P = .34), body mass index >25 (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.43-1.6]; P = .76), age >65 years (HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.89-3.1]; P = .11), severe valve disease (HR, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.52-3.5]; P = .68), or previous coronary artery bypass graft (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.8; P = .38). CONCLUSION: TRA for elective coronary angiography is noninferior to TFA when performed by experienced operators.

Biomarker-associated Monocyte Inflammatory Signaling in Myocardial Infarction

Abstract Background: Monocytes are essential components in inflammatory signaling, and their recruitment is crucial in the signaling pathway, which directs and determines cell adhesion to the activated endothelium. A better understanding of the correlation between monocyte subsets and inflammatory signaling in patients with atherosclerotic disease in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is essential for the development of more effective therapies for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To analyze differences between biomarkers and monocyte activation in the setting of ischemic heart disease. Methods: This was a case-control study comparing biomarkers and monocyte subsets between patients with ACS with and without ST-segment elevation and individuals without coronary stenosis. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences between groups, and Dunn's post hoc test was used to identify which groups were different. Cuzick's test for ordered group trends was used to assess falling or rising trends. Participants were classified into 3 groups: control (0); non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (1); ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) D1 (2). Results: Forty-seven patients with ACS and 19 controls with no obstructive lesions on coronary angiography were recruited. Monocyte profile assessment was statistically different regarding time of symptom onset and the presence or absence of atherosclerotic disease (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.0009). Dunn's post hoc test showed a significant difference between the control group and the STEMI D1 (p = 0.0014), STEMI D3 (p = 0.0036), and STEMI D7 (p = 0.0195) groups, corresponding to a 2-fold increase in classical (p = 0.0022) and nonclassical (p = 0.0031) monocytes compared with controls. For classical monocytes, there was a difference between the control group and all STEMI groups and between the NSTEMI group and the STEMI D1, D3, and D7 groups. For nonclassical monocytes, there was a difference between the control group and the STEMI D7 group (p = 0.0056) and between the NSTEMI group and the STEMI D7 group (p = 0.0166). Conclusion: This study found that there was an increase in total and classical monocyte mobilization at the time of acute myocardial infarction in patients with ACS.

Experiência inicial com a extensão de cateter-guia ExpressmanTM em um centro terciário de cardiologia de alto volume / Initial experience with the ExpressmanTM guide catheter extension in a high-volume tertiary cardiology center

Introdução: As extensões de cateter-guia fornecem maior suporte em intervenções coronárias percutâneas complexas. O ExpressmanTM é uma nova extensão de cateter-guia, e nosso objetivo foi avaliar o impacto de seu uso no sucesso do procedimento e nas complicações ocorridas em um centro de referência de alto volume. Métodos: Analisamos os dados de todos os procedimentos consecutivos em que foi usada uma extensão de cateter-guia ExpressmanTM. A decisão de usar uma extensão de cateter-guia ficou a critério do operador. O sucesso do dispositivo foi definido como o posicionamento bem-sucedido da extensão de cateter-guia dentro do vaso coronário, e o sucesso do procedimento foi definido como <20% de estenose residual e fluxo TIMI 3, sem perda significativa de ramos laterais. Eventos adversos cardíacos e cerebrovasculares maiores foram definidos como a combinação morte por todas as causas, infarto do miocárdio, revascularização do vaso-alvo e acidente vascular cerebral. Resultados: Foram incluídos 34 procedimentos entre abril de 2022 e janeiro de 2023. A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo masculino (59%), e a média de idade foi 66,5 anos. O uso da extensão de cateter-guia não foi planejado antes do procedimento em 17 procedimentos (50%). Os motivos mais comuns para o uso da extensão de cateter-guia foram angulação ou tortuosidade do vaso-alvo e posição desfavorável do óstio coronário. O sucesso do dispositivo foi obtido em 88% e o da revascularização, em 91%. Houve três oclusões de ramo lateral. Durante o acompanhamento clínico intra-hospitalar, não ocorreram sangramento e nem eventos adversos cardíacos e cerebrovasculares maiores. Conclusão: O sucesso do dispositivo e do procedimento foi alto, e a taxa de complicações foi baixa. O uso da extensão de cateter-guia como técnica de resgate em anatomias complexas permitiu o sucesso do procedimento na maioria dos pacientes que, de outro modo, não poderiam ser tratados.

Background: Guide catheter extensions provide increased support in complex percutaneous coronary interventions. The ExpressmanTM is a novel guide catheter extension and the objective was to assess the impact of its use on procedural success and complications in a high-volume reference center. Methods: We analyzed data from all consecutive procedures in which the ExpressmanTM guide catheter extension was used. The decision to use a guide catheter extension was at operator's discretion. Device success was defined as the successful positioning of the guide catheter extension in the coronary vessel and procedural success was defined as <20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow, with no loss of significant side branches. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke. Results: From April 2022 to January 2023, 34 procedures were included. The majority of the patients were male (59%) and the mean age was 66.5 years. Guide catheter extension use was not planned pre-procedure in 17 procedures (50%). The most common reasons for guide catheter extension use were target vessel angulation or tortuosity and unfavorable coronary ostium position. Device success was obtained in 88% and revascularization success in 91%. There were three side branch occlusions. During in-hospital clinical follow-up, no major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events or major bleeding occurred. Conclusion: The device success and procedural success were high and the rate of complications was low. Guide catheter extension use as bailout technique in complex anatomies allowed procedural success in the vast majority of otherwise untreatable patients.

Estreia da terapia de reparo transcateter edge-to-edge nas valvas tricúspide e mitral em um único procedimento na América Latina: relato de caso / First performance of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral and tricuspid valve repair in a single procedure in Latin America: case report

Apresentamos o caso debutante na América Latina de reparos transcateteres edge- to-edge nas valvas mitral e tricúspide em um único procedimento em paciente de alto risco para cirurgia. A paciente evoluía com insuficiência cardíaca e limitações em suas atividades diárias quando foi submetida ao procedimento, no qual foram realizados os reparos transcateteres das valvas mitral e tricúspide. Aos 6 meses de evolução, estava assintomática e realizando suas atividades diárias. Debatemos as recomendações mais atualizadas sobre a terapia transcateter para coexistência dessas doenças valvares, assim como expomos as lacunas no conhecimento.

We present the first case in Latin America of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral and tricuspid valve repair in a single procedure, in a patient at high risk for surgery. The patient progressed to heart failure and limitation in her daily living activities when she was submitted to transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair. Six months later, she was asymptomatic and performing her daily living activities. We discuss the most updated recommendations for transcatheter repair when both valvar conditions coexist, and show the knowledge gaps.

Incidence, Predictor, and Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Resheathing With Self-Expanding Valves During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background No study has evaluated the impact of the additional manipulation demanded by multiple resheathing (MR) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with repositionable self-expanding valves. Methods and Results This study included a real-world, multicenter registry involving 16 centers from Canada, Germany, Latin America, and Spain. All consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Evolut R, Evolut PRO, and Portico valves were included. Patients were divided according to the number of resheathing: no resheathing, single resheathing (SR), and MR. The primary end point was device success. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, early safety events, and 1-year mortality. In 1026 patients, the proportion who required SR and MR was 23.9% and 9.3%, respectively. MR was predicted by the use of Portico and moderate/severe aortic regurgitation at baseline (both with P<0.01). Patients undergoing MR had less device success (no resheathing=89.9%, SR=89.8%, and MR=80%; P=0.01), driven by more need for a second prosthesis and device embolization. At 30 days, there were no differences in safety events. At 1 year, more deaths occurred with MR (no resheathing=10.5%, SR=8.0%, and MR=18.8%; P=0.014). After adjusting for baseline differences and center experience by annual volume, MR associated with less device success (odds ratio, 0.42; P=0.003) and increased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 2.06; P=0.01). When including only the Evolut R/PRO cases (N=837), MR continued to have less device success (P<0.001) and a trend toward increased mortality (P=0.05). Conclusions Repositioning a self-expanding valve is used in a third of patients, being multiple in ≈10%. MR, but not SR, was associated with more device failure and higher 1-year mortality, regardless of the type of valve implanted.

Relationship between Mitral Regurgitation and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a Multi-Institutional Follow-up Study. / A Relação entre Regurgitação Mitral e Implante Transcateter de Válvula Aórtica: um Estudo de Acompanhamento Multi-Institucional.

BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is prevalent in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). There are some controversies about the prognostic impact of MR in survival of TAVI patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between TAVI and MR in a patient population from the Brazilian TAVI Registry. METHODS: Seven hundred and ninety-five patients from the Brazilian TAVI Registry were divided at baseline, discharge, and follow-up according to their MR grade as follows: absent/mild (AMMR) or moderate/severe (MSMR). They were subsequently regrouped according to their immediate and late changes in MR severity after TAVI as follows: no change, improved, or worsened MR. Predictors and prognostic impact on baseline as well as changes in MR severity were analyzed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Baseline MSMR was present in 19.3% of patients and was a predictor of increased late mortality. Immediately after TAVI, 47.4 % of cases improved to AMMR, predicted by a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons score and a higher grade of baseline aortic regurgitation. Upon follow-up, 9.2% of cases of AMMR worsened to MSMR, whereas 36.8% of cases of MSMR improved to AMMR. Lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and improvement in LVEF at follow-up were predictors of MR improvement. Progressive worsening of MR upon follow-up was an independent predictor of higher late mortality after TAVI (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline MSMR predicts late mortality after TAVI. Lower LVEF and improved LVEF at follow-up predict MR improvement after TAVI. Progressive worsening of MR severity at follow-up is an independent predictor of late mortality, which is a rare finding in the literature.

FUNDAMENTO: A regurgitação mitral (RM) é prevalente em pacientes submetidos a implante transcateter de válvula aórtica (TAVI). Há algumas controvérsias sobre o impacto prognóstico da RM na sobrevida de pacientes submetidos a TAVI. OBJETIVO: Examinar a relação entre TAVI e RM em uma população de pacientes do Registro Brasileiro de TAVI. MÉTODOS: Setecentos e noventa e cinco pacientes do Registro Brasileiro de TAVI foram divididos na linha de base, alta e acompanhamento de acordo com o grau da RM da maneira seguinte: ausente/leve (RMAL) ou moderado/grave (RMMG). Eles foram subsequentemente reagrupados de acordo com as mudanças imediatas e tardias na gravidade da RM após TAVI da maneira seguinte: RM sem mudança, melhora ou piora. Foram analisados os preditores e o impacto prognóstico na linha de base, bem como as mudanças na gravidade da RM. A significância estatística foi estabelecida em p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: RMMG basal estava presente em 19,3% dos pacientes e foi um preditor de aumento da mortalidade tardia. Imediatamente após o TAVI, 47,4% dos casos melhoraram para RMAL, previsto por uma pontuação mais alta da Society of Thoracic Surgeons e um grau mais alto de regurgitação aórtica basal. No acompanhamento, 9,2% dos casos de RMAL pioraram para RMMG, enquanto 36,8% dos casos de RMMG melhoraram para RMAL. Fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) mais baixa na linha de base e melhora na FEVE durante o acompanhamento foram preditores de melhora da RM. Piora progressiva da RM no acompanhamento foi um preditor independente de maior mortalidade tardia após TAVI (p = 0,005). CONCLUSÕES: A RMMG na linha de base é um preditor de mortalidade tardia após TAVI. FEVE mais baixa e melhora na FEVE durante o acompanhamento são preditores de melhora da RM após TAVI. A pior progressiva da gravidade da RM durante o acompanhamento é um preditor independente de mortalidade tardia; isto é um achado raro na literatura.

A Relação entre Regurgitação Mitral e Implante Transcateter de Válvula Aórtica: um Estudo de Acompanhamento Multi-Institucional / Relationship between Mitral Regurgitation and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a Multi-Institutional Follow-up Study

Resumo Fundamento A regurgitação mitral (RM) é prevalente em pacientes submetidos a implante transcateter de válvula aórtica (TAVI). Há algumas controvérsias sobre o impacto prognóstico da RM na sobrevida de pacientes submetidos a TAVI. Objetivo Examinar a relação entre TAVI e RM em uma população de pacientes do Registro Brasileiro de TAVI. Métodos Setecentos e noventa e cinco pacientes do Registro Brasileiro de TAVI foram divididos na linha de base, alta e acompanhamento de acordo com o grau da RM da maneira seguinte: ausente/leve (RMAL) ou moderado/grave (RMMG). Eles foram subsequentemente reagrupados de acordo com as mudanças imediatas e tardias na gravidade da RM após TAVI da maneira seguinte: RM sem mudança, melhora ou piora. Foram analisados os preditores e o impacto prognóstico na linha de base, bem como as mudanças na gravidade da RM. A significância estatística foi estabelecida em p < 0,05. Resultados RMMG basal estava presente em 19,3% dos pacientes e foi um preditor de aumento da mortalidade tardia. Imediatamente após o TAVI, 47,4% dos casos melhoraram para RMAL, previsto por uma pontuação mais alta da Society of Thoracic Surgeons e um grau mais alto de regurgitação aórtica basal. No acompanhamento, 9,2% dos casos de RMAL pioraram para RMMG, enquanto 36,8% dos casos de RMMG melhoraram para RMAL. Fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) mais baixa na linha de base e melhora na FEVE durante o acompanhamento foram preditores de melhora da RM. Piora progressiva da RM no acompanhamento foi um preditor independente de maior mortalidade tardia após TAVI (p = 0,005). Conclusões A RMMG na linha de base é um preditor de mortalidade tardia após TAVI. FEVE mais baixa e melhora na FEVE durante o acompanhamento são preditores de melhora da RM após TAVI. A pior progressiva da gravidade da RM durante o acompanhamento é um preditor independente de mortalidade tardia; isto é um achado raro na literatura.

Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) is prevalent in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). There are some controversies about the prognostic impact of MR in survival of TAVI patients. Objective To examine the relationship between TAVI and MR in a patient population from the Brazilian TAVI Registry. Methods Seven hundred and ninety-five patients from the Brazilian TAVI Registry were divided at baseline, discharge, and follow-up according to their MR grade as follows: absent/mild (AMMR) or moderate/severe (MSMR). They were subsequently regrouped according to their immediate and late changes in MR severity after TAVI as follows: no change, improved, or worsened MR. Predictors and prognostic impact on baseline as well as changes in MR severity were analyzed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Baseline MSMR was present in 19.3% of patients and was a predictor of increased late mortality. Immediately after TAVI, 47.4 % of cases improved to AMMR, predicted by a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons score and a higher grade of baseline aortic regurgitation. Upon follow-up, 9.2% of cases of AMMR worsened to MSMR, whereas 36.8% of cases of MSMR improved to AMMR. Lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and improvement in LVEF at follow-up were predictors of MR improvement. Progressive worsening of MR upon follow-up was an independent predictor of higher late mortality after TAVI (p = 0.005). Conclusions Baseline MSMR predicts late mortality after TAVI. Lower LVEF and improved LVEF at follow-up predict MR improvement after TAVI. Progressive worsening of MR severity at follow-up is an independent predictor of late mortality, which is a rare finding in the literature.

Improvement of renal function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is commonly found in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and has marked impact in their prognosis. It has been shown however that TAVR may improve renal function by alleviating the hemodynamic barrier imposed by AS. Nevertheless, the predictors of and clinical consequences of renal function improvement are not well established. Our aim was to assess the predictors of improvement of renal function after TAVR. METHODS: The present work is an analysis of the Brazilian Registry of TAVR, a national non-randomized prospective study with 22 Brazilian centers. Patients with baseline renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60mL/min/1.73m2) were stratified according to renal function after TAVR: increase >10% in eGFR were classified as TAVR induced renal function improvement (TIRFI); decrease > 10% in eGFR were classified as acute kidney injury (AKI) and stable renal function (neither criteria). RESULTS: A total of 819 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe AS were included. Of these, baseline renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60mL/min/1.73m2) was present in 577 (70%) patients. Considering variance in renal function between baseline and at discharge after TAVR procedure, TIRFI was seen in 197 (34.1%) patients, AKI in 203 (35.2%), and stable renal function in 177 (30.7%). The independent predictors of TIRFI were: absence of coronary artery disease (OR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.98; P = 0.039) and lower baseline eGFR (OR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-1.00; P = 0.039). There was no significant difference in 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality between patients with stable renal function or TIRFI. Nonetheless, individuals that had AKI after TAVR presented higher mortality compared with TIRFI and stable renal function groups (29.3% vs. 15.4% vs. 9.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TIRFI was frequently found among baseline impaired renal function individuals but was not associated with improved 1-year outcomes.

Comparative clinical performance of two types of drug-eluting stents with abluminal biodegradable polymer coating: Five-year results of the DESTINY randomized trial

Resumo Introdução e objetivos: Stents Coated with the Biodegradable Polymer on their Abluminal Faces and Elution of Sirolimus Versus Biolimus Elution for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (Destiny Trial) é um estudo randomizado de não inferioridade que comparou o stent farmacológico eluído com Sirolimus Inspiron® (SES) ao controle o stent Biomatrix® Flex eluído com biolimus (BES). Relatórios dentro do primeiro ano mostraram resultados semelhantes para ambos os stents, em seguimento clínico, angiográfico e também em análise de tomografia de coerência ótica e ultrassom intracoronário. A presente análise tem como objetivo comparar o desempenho clínico desses dois stents farmacológicos com polímeros biodegradáveis após cinco anos do procedimento índice. Métodos: Foram randomizados 170 pacientes (194 lesões) em uma proporção de 2:1 para trata mento com SES ou BES, respetivamente. O desfecho primário para o presente estudo foi a taxa em cinco anos de eventos cardíacos adversos maiores combinados, definida como morte cardíaca, infarto do miocárdio ou revascularização da lesão-alvo. Resultados: Em cinco anos, o desfecho primário ocorreu em 12,5% e 17,9% para o grupo SES e BES, respectivamente (p=0,4). Não houve trombose de stent definitiva ou provável entre os pacientes tratados com o novo SES durante os cinco anos de seguimento e ausência de trombose de stent após o primeiro ano no grupo BES. Conclusões: O novo stent Inspiron® apresentou uma boa e semelhante performance clínica no seguimento em longo prazo, quando comparado com o controle o stent de última geração Biomatrix® Flex.

Comparative clinical performance of two types of drug-eluting stents with abluminal biodegradable polymer coating: Five-year results of the DESTINY randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Stents Coated With the Biodegradable Polymer on Their Abluminal Faces and Elution of Sirolimus Versus Biolimus Elution for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions - DESTINY Trial is a non-inferiority randomized study that compared the Inspiron™ sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with the control Biomatrix™ Flex biolimus-eluting stent (BES). Previous reports in the first year showed similar outcomes for both stents, in clinical, angiographic, optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound assessments. The present analysis aims to compare the clinical performance of these two biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents five years after the index procedure. METHODS: A total of 170 patients (194 lesions) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio for treatment with SES or BES, respectively. The primary endpoint for the present study was the five-year rate of combined major adverse cardiac events, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: At five years, the primary endpoint occurred in 12.5% and 17.9% of the SES and BES groups, respectively (p=0.4). There was no definite or probable stent thrombosis among patients treated with the novel SES stent during the five years of follow-up, and no stent thrombosis after the first year in the BES group. CONCLUSIONS: The novel Inspiron™ stent had similar good clinical performance in long-term follow-up when compared head-to-head with the control latest-generation Biomatrix™ Flex biolimus-eluting stent.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Where are we in 2020?

Abstract Aortic stenosis is an insidious disease of rapid progression after the onset of symptoms. Aortic valve replacement surgery is a well-established therapy that reduces symptoms and increases survival rates. However, the procedure may be associated with high operative mortality rates and promote comorbidity. Depending on the local reality, the prevalence of patients considered inoperable (due to medical comorbidities and age) may achieve 30%. For these patients, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was initially indicated; over time, the method has advanced technologically and been simplified, and become an alternative therapy for patients at low and intermediate surgical risk also, and considered one of the major advances of modern medicine.

Aspirin-Free Prasugrel Monotherapy Following Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients With Stable CAD: The ASET Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that prasugrel monotherapy following successful everolimus-eluting stent implantation is feasible and safe in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that short dual-antiplatelet therapy strategies may provide an adequate balance between ischemic and bleeding risks. However, the complete omission of aspirin immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been tested so far. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label trial with a stopping rule based on the occurrence of definite stent thrombosis (if >3, trial enrollment would be terminated). Patients undergoing successful everolimus-eluting stent implantation for stable CAD with SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores <23 were included. All participants were on standard dual-antiplatelet therapy at the time of index PCI. Aspirin was discontinued on the day of the index procedure but given prior to the procedure; prasugrel was administered in the catheterization laboratory immediately after the successful procedure, and aspirin-free prasugrel became the therapy regimen from that moment. Patients were treated solely with prasugrel for 3 months. The primary ischemic endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, spontaneous target vessel myocardial infarction, or definite stent thrombosis, and the primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 and 5 bleeding up to 3 months. RESULTS: From February 22, 2018, to May 7, 2019, 201 patients were enrolled. All patients underwent PCI for stable CAD. Overall, 98.5% of patients were adherent to prasugrel at 3-month follow-up. The primary ischemic and bleeding endpoints occurred in 1 patient (0.5%). No stent thrombosis events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin-free prasugrel monotherapy following successful everolimus-eluting stent implantation demonstrated feasibility and safety without any stent thrombosis in selected low-risk patients with stable CAD. These findings may help underpin larger randomized controlled studies to evaluate the aspirin-free strategy compared with traditional dual-antiplatelet therapy following PCI. (Acetyl Salicylic Elimination Trial: The ASET Pilot Study [ASET]; NCT03469856).

Síndromes coronarianas agudas no contexto atual da pandemia COVID-19 / Acute coronary syndromes in the current context of the Covid-19 pandemic

INTRODUÇÃO A COVID-19, descrita inicialmente no final de 2019 na China, pode, nas formas graves, cursar como pneumonia atípica e síndrome do desconforto respiratório grave.1 Classificada em fevereiro de 2020 como pandemia2 pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), tem determinado importantes repercussões clínicas, sociais, políticas e econômicas, deixando marcas, consequências e aprendizados. A sociedade como um todo teve que se adaptar à uma nova realidade. Hospitais precisaram reescrever suas rotinas e procedimentos operacionais. A criação de cuidados especiais para evitar a disseminação interna dos vetores de contaminação tornou-se imperativa. Unidades dedicadas à COVID foram montadas, e ações protocolares de biossegurança foram instaladas. Recursos humanos, materiais e financeiros foram alocados no intuito de proporcionar a melhor qualidade assistencial possível, sem prejuízo à segurança das equipes. O isolamento social, principal forma de conter a disseminação da doença, permitiu, em algumas localidades, o "achatamento da curva", evitando o esgotamento total do sistema de saúde. No entanto, ainda é uma incógnita a extensão de duração da doença, risco de contágio e manutenção de todos os cuidados. Os sintomas clássicos da COVID-19 são bem conhecidos,3,4 e a maioria dos infectados tem apresentações clínicas brandas.